dragon_formal_strategy_memo.md 3.1 KB

Dragon Formal Strategy Memo

Strategy Identity

  • Instrument scope: 399673 only
  • Current strongest branch: alpha_first_glued_refined_hot_cap
  • Control branch: alpha_first_selective_veto
  • Reconstruction branch: workbook_preserving

Official Objective

Build an explainable, robust alpha strategy on 399673 where:

  • robustness is more important than perfect workbook resemblance
  • useless short trades are removed first
  • large trend profits are preserved
  • annualized return is a secondary consequence, not the first optimization target

Current Strategy Judgment

Quant Best Branch

  • alpha_first_glued_refined_hot_cap

Why:

  • better avg return
  • better profit factor
  • better win rate
  • better drawdown profile
  • better execution-aware stress behavior
  • better short-loss clustering than control

Conservative Governance Branch

  • alpha_first_selective_veto

Why:

  • smaller workbook divergence
  • easier bridge from reconstruction to alpha-first research

Edge Source

The current edge is not broad and diffuse. It is concentrated in:

  • glued_buy as the main alpha engine
  • preserved medium and long holding winners
  • deletion of weak short-holding glued trades
  • support from early_crash_probe_buy
  • secondary support from oversold_recovery_buy and dual_gold_resonance_buy

The branch does not mainly improve by:

  • adding many new trade paths
  • aggressive curve-fit threshold searching
  • deleting profitable samples

Known Weak Points

  • weak deep-oversold subtypes remain fragile
  • secondary rebound families are not strong edge sources
  • worst loss family is still glued_buy, even though refined has improved it
  • governance still needs to decide whether workbook overlap is a hard gate or a cost metric

What Is Already Proven

  • removed trades vs control are low quality
  • refined is locally stable under nearby threshold perturbations
  • refined remains ahead under transaction cost pressure
  • refined remains ahead under next-open and next-close execution assumptions
  • refined has better loss clustering and drawdown duration than control

What Must Not Be Done

  • do not resume workbook-style micro-alignment as the main optimization path
  • do not blind-tune predictive bridge exits
  • do not change glued selective veto thresholds inside the formal branch without opening a new research branch
  • do not treat auxiliary signal cleanup as the main alpha frontier

Current Operating Rule

  • forward default: alpha_first_glued_refined_hot_cap
  • benchmark control: alpha_first_selective_veto
  • reconstruction audit baseline: workbook_preserving

Next Research Focus

  • execution-aware robustness should remain the live validation layer
  • future optimization should target weak secondary families, not the core glued alpha trunk
  • any new candidate must beat refined on both quality and robustness, not just workbook resemblance

Bottom Line

alpha_first_glued_refined_hot_cap is now the best strategy branch in the workspace from a quant point of view.

If it is not promoted, that should be treated as a governance choice. It should no longer be treated as an unresolved research question.