Etusivu Tutki Apua
Kirjaudu sisään
openclaw
/
cyb50-quant
1
0
Fork 0
Tiedostot Ongelmat 0 Pull-pyynnöt 0 Wiki
Puu: fa4f4147ea
Branchit Tagit
cyb50-quant
/
research
/
chinext50_regime_project
/
USER.md

USER.md 3.0 KB
Historia Raaka

User

  • Prefers Chinese communication in this workspace.
  • Current focus on the chinext50_regime_project research project.
  • Asked on 2026-04-08 to read carefully and analyze the project logic.
  • On 2026-04-09, asked to continue OpenSpec proposal and immediately start implementation once proposal was ready.
  • On 2026-04-09, confirmed preference to proceed in sequence: proposal first, then continue implementation.
  • On 2026-04-09, explicitly authorized autonomous continuation without further confirmation until completion.
  • On 2026-04-09, asked to continue improving according to GPT Pro suggestions while keeping OpenSpec-driven development flow.
  • On 2026-04-09, asked to keep progressing by OpenSpec change flow and keep chinext50_regime_build_handoff_2026-04-08.md as reference baseline.
  • On 2026-04-09, confirmed to start immediately and continue autonomous execution across sequential OpenSpec changes.
  • On 2026-04-09, approved implementing a concrete data-fetch/ingestion pipeline and asked to proceed directly.
  • On 2026-04-09, requested Akshare-first fetching with Mairui fallback for missing data and provided Mairui API access details.
  • On 2026-04-09, requested packaging code + review questions into a zip for GPT Pro.
  • On 2026-04-09, requested analysis of chinext50_regime_review_2026-04-09.md and a concrete improvement plan before the next implementation round.
  • On 2026-04-09, required strict execution of GPT Pro blocker checklist chinext50_blocker_checklist_for_codex.md in B1 -> B6 order under OpenSpec flow, with per-blocker file/test/metric reporting and no threshold/policy tuning before B1-B5 completion.
  • On 2026-04-10, user required strict execution of chinext50_post_b3_feedback_response_for_codex_2026-04-10.md in sequence: D0 -> preparatory repair-threshold code change -> H1b.1-L1 -> L2 -> L3 -> if all fail then H1b.2-direct-from-R1.
  • User expects per-block reporting: changed files, targeted tests, stitched metric delta, state mix delta, and exposure diagnostics delta.
  • 2026-04-10: User explicitly asked to continue without confirmation loops. Prefer direct execution and concise status updates.
  • User prefers reducing scope to practical small-team execution rather than heavy research workflow.
  • 2026-04-11: User reiterated that core unfinished goal is practical profitability; specifically prioritized experiments on execution timing and entry-specific exit to reduce false-cut miss and improve trend re-entry quality.
  • 2026-04-24: User requested a main-thread supervision loop: continuously monitor progress until task completion or true blockage, supervise subtask advancement, make local decisions on issues, and prioritize convergence to avoid endless project expansion.
  • 2026-04-24: User prefers subtasks to advance in OpenSpec style whenever possible.
  • 2026-04-24: User further clarified that the main thread should treat convergence of the entire project to a final finished state as the objective, not just completion of individual changes. Mid-process routing and local decisions should be made autonomously by me.